Tax Contribution & Assessment

Property tax values, city revenue, and equipment exemptions for Woodbury data centers

Overview

Data centers generate property tax revenue based on building value (assessed by county assessor). Equipment (servers, chillers, generators) worth tens of millions is exempt from the property tax roll in Minnesota, reducing the tax base significantly.

Key Finding: Combined city tax contribution from both facilities is approximately $118,000/year—equivalent to 20–25 median Woodbury homes and 0.23% of the city's $52.1M total levy. Meanwhile, 500 Bielenberg's assessed value dropped 7% ($725K) during the 30 MW build-out year.

Assessed Values & Tax Capacity (2022–2027)

401 Bielenberg Drive (MSP 01)

YearTotal EMVChangeTax Capacity*Annual Tax
2022$4,947,000—$98,190~$137,800
2023$5,342,800+$395,800$106,106~$149,000
2024$6,679,800+$1,337,000$132,846~$186,200
2025$6,642,200−$37,600$132,094~$185,000
2026$6,642,200$0$132,094~$185,874
2027 (prelim.)$7,125,200+$483,000$141,754~$191,764

* Tax capacity = EMV × state class rate. City's direct share (31.16% of tax capacity) is approximately $44,000/year.

500 Bielenberg Drive (MSP 02, Lot 4 only)

YearTotal EMVChangeTax Capacity*Annual Tax
2022$19,939,600—$398,042~$559,000
2023$18,160,500−$1,779,100$362,460~$508,000
2024$17,470,400−$690,100$348,658~$488,000
2025$12,321,900−$5,148,500$245,688~$344,000
2026$12,321,900$0$245,688~$359,842
2027 (prelim.)$11,597,100−$724,800 (−5.9%)$231,192~$357,170

* Split occurred in 2025 when Main Event Bowling purchased Lot 2. 2027 figures are Lot 4 only (data center building).

Critical Finding: 500 Bielenberg's value dropped 7% ($725K) between 2025 and 2026 assessments—during the exact year Eden Ventures was marketing and building out 30 MW of data center capacity. Either the buildout did not happen, or the assessor did not see the data center in the building's value.

Combined City Tax Contribution

Annual City Tax Revenue (2026 Actual)

401 Bielenberg
$41,000
~23%
500 Bielenberg (Lot 4)
$77,000
~77%
Total: ~$118,000/year from both facilities
Equivalent to 20–25 median Woodbury homes (~$450K EMV each)

Context: City Levy Impact

MetricValue
Woodbury total city levy (2025)$52.1 million
Data center city tax contribution~$118,000
Percentage of levy0.23%
Equivalent number of median homes20–25 homes
Finding: Both data center facilities combined contribute less than 1/4 of 1% of Woodbury's city tax levy. Their tax impact is minimal relative to utility draw, noise, and expansion risk.

Equipment Exemption: The Hidden Value

What's Exempt from Tax Roll

In Minnesota, servers, chillers, generators, and power systems (personal property) are exempt from property tax. Only the building shell counts.

Equipment TypeEstimated Value per MW15 MW Facility6 MW Facility
Servers & data hall hardware$3–5M$45–75M$18–30M
Cooling system (chillers)$500K–1M$7.5–15M$3–6M
Power systems (generators, UPS)$500K–1M$7.5–15M$3–6M
Electrical & distribution$200–500K$3–7.5M$1.2–3M
Total exempt equipment per facility~$63–113M~$25–45M

Full Buildout Scenario (66 MW + 34 MW)

If both facilities expand to full marketed capacity:

FacilityCapacityEquipment Value (est.)Tax Contribution if Built
401 Bielenberg66 MW~$200–330M~$153,000/year (est.)
500 Bielenberg34 MW~$100–170M~$80,000/year (est.)
Combined100 MW~$300–500M~$233,000/year
Key Issue: $300–500M in servers and equipment would be exempt from tax roll. Only the $18M building shell would be taxed. This is why per-MW tax capacity is so low (~$12,400/MW).

Historical Comparison: The Hartford Era

The Hartford Insurance (2014): Before Data Centers

Metric2014 (Hartford Era)2027 (Data Center Proposed)Change
Tax capacity (total campus)$406,138~$372,946−$33,192 (−8.2%)
Rank (city taxpayers)#8 (largest)~#10 (proposed)Dropped 2 spots
Employees on site~400~10 (data center ops only)−390 jobs
Use typeOffice / InsuranceData center + Topgolf/Main EventTransformed
Finding: The Hartford campus lost tax ranking from #8 to out of top 10 despite adding 21 MW of operational data center capacity. The Topgolf redevelopment (Lot 1) is now more valuable than the data center tower.

The 500 Bielenberg Assessment Anomaly

The Mystery: 500 Bielenberg's assessed value dropped 7% ($725K) between 2025 and 2026 assessments—the exact year Eden Ventures was marketing 30 MW of expansion capacity and commissioning equipment.

Possible Explanations

  1. The buildout didn't happen: Marketing said 30 MW by 2026, but construction stalled. Value dropped because building remains mostly vacant.
  2. Assessor missed the data center: Equipment (worth $100M+ at 30 MW) was installed but not captured in building value assessment. Assessor saw office building, not data center retrofit.
  3. Met Council influence: City filed "mixed use office" determination with Met Council (Jan 2025) to avoid stormwater charges. Assessor may have used old "office" comps instead of data center value.
  4. Equipment personal property: If data center equipment is properly classified as exempt personal property, building value alone should drop. But $725K drop is steep for office-to-data retrofit.
Significance: If the assessor is not capturing data center value, Woodbury is losing tax revenue. Conversely, if value correctly dropped because buildout stalled, the 30 MW expansion is not actually happening despite marketing claims.

Tax Court Petition Deadline

April 30, 2027: Operator has one year from 2026 assessment to petition Tax Court if they dispute the value. If no petition is filed, the 7% drop stands as assessor's final decision.

Action: Monitor Tax Court public docket (mn.gov/tax-court) after April 30, 2027 to see if operator challenges 2026 assessment. A petition would reveal whether the buildout is real or the value drop is justified.

Per-Megawatt Tax Analysis

Data centers are priced by capacity, not by property value. Industry standard: ~$12,400–15,000 per megawatt in annual tax.

FacilityLive CapacityAnnual TaxPer-MW Tax
401 Bielenberg15 MW~$185,874~$12,391/MW
500 Bielenberg (2026)6 MW~$359,842~$59,974/MW
Combined Average21 MW~$545,716~$25,987/MW
Note: 500's per-MW tax is high because the building value is spread across only 6 MW of current load. If the facility expands to 34 MW, per-MW tax drops dramatically to ~$10,577/MW. At 100 MW combined capacity, per-MW tax would drop to ~$5,457/MW.

Key Questions for City Council

1. Assessment Methodology: How does the county assessor value data center buildings? Are servers and equipment value captured in building assessment, or are they assumed exempt and reflected in lower building value?

2. 500 Bielenberg Value Drop: Why did 500 Bielenberg's assessed value drop $725K (7%) between 2025 and 2026 assessments during the exact year Eden Ventures was building out 30 MW? Will the city request an assessor explanation?

3. Tax Court Petition: Will city monitor Tax Court docket after April 30, 2027 to see if Eden Ventures or Woodbury Capital petition the 2026 assessments?

4. Future Capacity Tax Impact: If both facilities expand to 66 MW + 34 MW (100 MW total), what is the projected city tax contribution? How much of that comes from building value vs. equipment value (if any)?

5. Cost-Benefit: Given that 100 MW of data center capacity would contribute only ~0.4% of city levy, how does this compare to the utility cost shift, noise impact, and water/sewer strain on residents?

Sources & References

Washington County Assessor Data — MetroGIS Regional Parcel Dataset (2021–2026 assessments)

Woodbury ACFR 2025 — Annual Comprehensive Financial Report; Table 7 (tax rates), Table 8 (historic tax capacity rankings)

Minnesota Property Tax Law — Personal property exemption for equipment (Minn. Stat. § 272B)

Tax Court Public Docket — mn.gov/tax-court (monitor after April 30, 2027)

Eden Ventures Purchase — eCRV 1651176 ($17.5M, July 2023)

Data Center Industry Benchmarks — ~$12.4K–15K per megawatt annual tax (verified against Twin Cities market comparables)